To me this was perfect event for this moment, given the
raucous in our homes and streets and wall spaces. The responses were nothing spectacularly
different to those we have been hearing on the TV channels, but the fact that
they were all there together must have given the viewership, as it was for me,
a leveling experience, beyond the individual bloat their TV channels gave each
of them. Yet, I wonder whether this spectacle of the four on stage together may
have moved hearts and minds from the groove of political affiliation that we
all seem to hold so glued to. I say this because – in our case in Maldives - of
the emotional attachment we all seem to have to each of our cherished candidates. It would seem that no verbal or physical show
or glitter can move us from our vantage of our support. There are other things that can, I submit, but
not an analysis of what the candidates said, even with the conviction that they
did on that stage.
So what is the purpose of the debate? To me it was the
opportunity to see the four together and the occasion to measure one against the
other in common public space. Such shows provide us the moment to compare the
promises and assurances our candidates make in common space and time. This has
a warming effect of seeing leaders in a democracy as normal human beings like
us, thrust before us in the existential moment, for a struggle of making themselves seem credible to us – in a moment where
they have no advantage of a TV channel or converted viewership to give
unbridled confidence. Here, everybody is
watching – a multi-party viewership, and perhaps for the first time for many to
see their idol juxtaposed with others, away from the comfort zone of being in the midst of the supportive
arms of fans and followers. It is a leveling experience for the audience, and
I am sure for the candidates too.
It was a good show. Congratulations to the sponsors!
No comments:
Post a Comment